William J. Olson, P.C., Attorneys at Law
Constitutional Law
Nonprofit Law
Postal Law
Health Law
Firearms Law
Election Law
Litigation
Biblical Wisdom
Press Coverage
Publications
HIstorical Documents
Martial Law
Executive Orders
Favorite Links
Favorite Quotations
Follow Us Olsonlaw

Sign Up Today!

Sign up for our      Newsletter     


William J. Olson P.C.
Files 75th Supreme Court Amicus Brief



On August 13, 2014, our firm had the privilege of filing its 75th amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Rudy v. Lee. In addition, we have made 12 other filings in the U.S. Supreme Court (for a total of 87 filings), such as: Petition for Certiorari, Jurisdictional Statement, Appellants' Brief, Reply Brief, and Brief for Intervenor-Respondents.

In addition to statutory issues, these briefs have addressed a wide variety of Constitutional issues:

Article I Section 1 (Delegation Doctrine)
Article I Section 2 (Census, Apportionment Clause)
Article I Section 4 (Time, Places and Manners of Elections)
Article I Section 6 (Speech & Debate Clause)
Article I Section 8 (Commerce Clause, Naturalization Clause, General Welfare Clause, Necessary & Proper Clause)

Article II Section 1 (Delegation Doctrine)
Article II Section 2 (Invasion)
Article II (Appointments Clause, Commander-in-Chief)

Article III, Section 2 (Case and Controversy, Standing, Political Question)
Article III Section 1 (Judicial Power)

Article IV Section IV (Republican Form of Government, Invasion)Article VI (Preemption)

First Amendment (Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, Right to Assemble, Right to Petition Government)
Second Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment (Due Process, Equal Protection Component)
Tenth Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process, Equal Protection, Privileges & Immunities)

Other briefs have addressed important statutory issues (U.N. Participation Act, Gun Control Act, National Firearms Act, Firearms Owners Protection Act, Uniform Code of Military Justice, Federal Election Campaign Act, etc.).

Our first Supreme Court filing was October 16, 1981, supporting the legality of President Reagan's action against striking air traffic controllers. Of course, we have also filed many other briefs in various U.S. District Court, U.S. Courts of Appeals, State Supreme Courts, etc. All of these filings since the late 1990's and some earlier briefs are available on this website, and we are working to post the older filings as well.


William J. Olson, P.C., Attorneys At Law

Postal Law


Postal Policy Papers by John Haldi & William J. Olson


“Evaluating Negotiated Services Agreements for Market Dominant Products Under PAEA”
(Presented at the 27th Annual Eastern Conference, Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition, Skytop, Pennsylvania, May 15, 2008)


"Enhancing Competition By Unbundling the Postal Administration"
(Presented at the Thirteenth Conference on Postal & Delivery Economics, Antwerp, Belgium, June 1 - 4, 2005)
Published in Crew & Kleindorfer, Progress Toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Springer Science+ Business Media, Inc., 2006.


Draft Paper on Postal Pricing: Top Down Discounts Versus Bottom Up Surcharges (March 24, 2004). Please e-mail suggestions to Haldi and Olson.

"An Evaluation of USPS Worksharing: Postal Revenues and Costs from Workshared Activities"
(Presented in Toledo, Spain in June 4-7, 2003, at the Eleventh "Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics" of the Center for Research in Regulated Industries at Rutgers University)
Published in Crew & Kleindorfer, Competitive Transformation of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.


Postal Revenues Earned from Workshared Activities (May 13, 2003)

Postal Costs of Workshared Activities (May 13, 2003)

Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer, of the Center for Research in Regulated Industries, Rutgers University, host an annual, international Conference on Postal Delivery and Economics


Other


Brief of Intervenors L.L. Bean, Inc., Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc., and Valpak Dealers' Association, Inc. in USPS v. PRC, No. 11-1117, in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (December 7, 2011)

Free Speech Coalition Reply Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission in Docket No. PI2008 4 on the Cooperative Mail Rule (July 24, 2008)

Free Speech Coalition Initial Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission in Docket No. PI2008 4 on the Cooperative Mail Rule (June 24, 2008)

Gun Owners of America/Gun Owners Foundation Comments to the U.S. Postal Service Regarding "Proposed New Standards Prohibit the Mailing of Replica or Inert Munitions" (April 4, 2008)

Association of Priority Mail Users Fourth Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission on Regulations Establishing A System of Ratemaking (PRC Docket No. RM2007-1) (October 9, 2007)

Association of Priority Mail Users Reply Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission on Regulations Establishing A System of Ratemaking (July 3, 2007)

Association of Priority Mail Users Second Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission on Regulations Establishing A System of Ratemaking (June 18, 2007)

Association of Priority Mail Users Comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission on Regulations Establishing A System of Ratemaking (April 6,2007)

United Seniors Association v. Social Security Administration Amicus Brief Filed to Attack Federal Statute Censoring 15 Political Words (February 24, 2006)

Free Speech Coaltion Comments to the President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service (February 12, 2003)


Association of Priority Mail Users Comments to the President's Commission on the U.S. Postal Service (February 12, 2003)

Comments on Proposed Settlement in Postal Rate Commission Docket No. MC2002-3 (December 10, 2002)


Aid Association for Lutherans v. United States Postal Service (November 15, 2002)

Bill Olson and John Haldi submitted Issues for Discussion at the Postal Ratemaking Summit in Potomac, Maryland sponsored by the U.S. Postal Service and the Postal Rate Commission (May 28, 2002).

USPS Governors' Usurpation of Ratemaking Process Denies Due Process to Mailers

New Postmaster General: Bill Olson was quoted today on trafficworld.com discussing the Postal Service's new Postmaster General. (May 24, 2001)

Reply Brief of the Association of Priority Mail Users, Inc., Postal Rate Commission Docket No. R2000-1 (September 22, 2000)

Initial Brief of the Association of Priority Mail Users, Inc., Postal Rate Commission Docket No. R2000-1 (September 13, 2000)

Postal Service Subpoena Case Reply Brief, United States of America v. American Target Advertising, Inc. et. al., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (August 18, 2000)

Postal Service Subpoena Case, United States of America v. American Target Advertising, Inc. et. al., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (June 29, 2000)

Free Speech Coalition Testimony on S.335, Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement Act (May 19, 1999)

The counter-culture appears to take over the stamp selection process at the Post Office



Association of Priorty Mail Users



Constitutional Law | Nonprofit Law | Postal Law | Health Law | Firearms Law | Election Law | Litigation
Biblical Wisdom | Press Coverage | Publications | Historical Documents | Martial Law
Executive Orders | About Us | Office Location | Contact Us | Favorite Links

Copyright © 2014 William J. Olson, P.C. All rights reserved.

This William J. Olson, P.C. Web site, including all information and material appearing herein, is for general informational purposes only, and is not intended to -- and does not -- constitute legal advice, advertising, or solicitation. No one should rely or act on any information contained on this Web site, including other sites that may be referenced herein, without seeking professional advice or counsel. No advice or counsel is provided in or by this Web site. Furthermore, no attorney-client relationship is created, or established, between William J. Olson, P.C. or any of its attorneys and anyone by virtue of anyone accessing or using this Web site, transmitting information to the Web site or receiving information from the Web site. William J. Olson, P.C. does not recommend use of the Internet, including e-mail, for the transmission of confidential, proprietary, and/or otherwise sensitive information.

  • vetement louis vuitton pas cher
  • louis vuitton soldes
  • jordan kd pas cher
  • air jordan 6 femme
  • ghd PAS CHER
  • vetement ghd france
  • vetement Louboutin pas cher Soldes