The district court invalidated a Florida statute designed to protect minors from the current fad of transgenderism, for violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Our amicus brief rejected the district court’s assumption that a law based on transgender status was equivalent to racism. We also showed that the district court erroneously relied on medical “standards” recommended by an transgender advocacy group — the “World Professional Association for Transgender Health” (“WPATH”). We also defended numerous state legislators’ right to reference our Creator God, which the district court said demonstrated animus.
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters, Episode 6