Today we filed an amicus brief for former United States Attorney General Edwin Meese III supporting the dismissal of criminal charges against General Michael Flynn. In our brief we argue that the Attorney General of the United States, not a federal district judge, has the primary responsibility for ensuring that criminal charges are brought only for violations of actual federal crimes. In the
Law Matters — Episode 30
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our two U.S. Supreme Court Amicus briefs, on application for stay and on the merits, in Trump v. Slaughter.
Presentation on The Meaning of Rights and the Corruption of Language
Bill Olson gave a presentation today entitled “What is a Right? The Meaning of Rights and the Corruption of Language” at the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance’s Medical Freedom and the Constitution: Protecting Yourself from Government Overreach conference.
Law Matters — Episode 28
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief in National Religious Broadcasters v. IRS, at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. This brief argues that the Johnson Amendment, a 1952 modification to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)
Law Matters — Episode 27
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our Amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in RICELS v. Noem on the Constitution’s Separation of Powers doctrine and the scope of a President’s executive power to design and implement national immigration policies.
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services v. Noem — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 27.
First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 29.
National Religious Broadcasters v. IRS — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 28.
Steve Gruber Show Interview
Bill Olson interview discussing our 8-0 winning record on amicus briefs filed with the Supreme Court on Trump Administration Motions for Stay.
Law Matters — Episode 26
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in McMahon v. State of New York, where we supported the Trump Administration’s application to stay a district court injunction of the Administration’s efforts to downsize the U.S. Department of Education.
5th Circuit Dissent Cites our Amicus Brief
Today, a dissenting opinion in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit quoted from our amicus brief filed last year:
“At ‘the epicenter’ of this border crisis stands the State of Texas…. Texas and Mexico share about two-thirds of the nearly 2000-mile southern border. As a result, approximately half of the immigrants who have crossed the southern border have crossed
McMahon v. State of New York — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 26