Today we filed an amicus brief for former United States Attorney General Edwin Meese III supporting the dismissal of criminal charges against General Michael Flynn. In our brief we argue that the Attorney General of the United States, not a federal district judge, has the primary responsibility for ensuring that criminal charges are brought only for violations of actual federal crimes. In the
Law Matters — Episode 50
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Defending Education v. Sullivan, a challenge to the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA), which imposes gender ideology mandates in violation of the First Amendment.
Law Matters — Episode 49
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief filed at the U.S. Supreme Court in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Blanche, a case challenging the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a federal law enacted by Congress as a 21-page subsection of the voluminous 1500-page National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2021.
Bill Olson Interviewed on The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast
Bill Olson joined Sharyl Attkisson to discuss our amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, a landmark case on whether birthright citizenship should continue to be offered to illegal immigrants and Chinese tourists, among others.
Law Matters — Episode 47
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our recent amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Reel v. North Carolina, a case challenging the expansion of a controversial law enforcement tactic known as the “knock and talk” technique, which allows officers
Law Matters — Episode 46
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a First Amendment challenge under the free speech and freedom of religion clauses, to Colorado’s exclusion of Catholic preschools from participation
Bill Olson presentation to Gun Owners of America
Bill Olson gave a presentation at an all-staff meeting of Gun Owners of America held in Maryland on May 6, 2026. The presentation explained how GOA’s two Supreme Court amicus briefs (here and here) in United States v. Antoine Jones helped restore the property basis for the Fourth Amendment, and how subsequent briefs have sought to expand it.
Law Matters — Episode 43
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot, consolidated cases regarding challenges to the statutory authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syria and Haiti, and the ban on judicial review that was established by Congress when the program was enacted.
Law Matters — Episode 42
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear International Partners for Ethical Care (IPEC) v. Ferguson, a challenge to a Washington State law that facilitates trafficking of minors and violates parental rights by giving runaway minors “gender affirming treatment” without parental notice or consent.
Bill Olson Interview – the 14th Amendment and Birthright Citizenship
Bill Olson and Steve Gruber discussed the 14th Amendment’s application to the Birthright Citizenship issue and our amicus brief before today’s Supreme Court oral argument.
Law Matters — Episode 41
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief filed at the U.S. Supreme Court in Chatrie v. United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of geofence warrants used by law enforcement to obtain digital information from cell phone service providers and whether such warrants violate Fourth Amendment rights.
Chatrie v. United States — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 41
Law Matters — Episode 38
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief filed at the U.S. Supreme Court in Stockton v. Brown, urging the court to hear a case on whether censoring and disciplining physicians for expressing medical opinions that diverge from government positions is unconstitutional.
Law Matters — Episode 37
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief at the Supreme Court of the United States in Noem, et al. v. Al Otro Lado, where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit distorted the clear statutory meaning of “arrives in the U.S.” for purposes of filing U.S. asylum claims.