Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Wolford v. Lopez, a case challenging the constitutionality of a Hawaii firearms statute which essentially criminalizes the possession of firearms in nearly all public settings, such as stores, restaurants, and gas stations.
Law Matters — Episode 32
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in NAGR v. Lamont, and how activist legislators and judges violate the Second Amendment protection of our rights, and attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 decision in Bruen.
Wolford v. Lopez — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 33.
NAGR v. Lamont — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 32.
Law Matters — Episode 21
Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in Missouri v. United States, defending the Missouri’s 2021 “Second Amendment Preservation Act” to protect its citizens’ rights to bear arms by prohibiting state employees from enforcing federal gun regulations that violate the Second Amendment.
Smith and Wesson v. Mexico — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 14
Law Matters — Episode 12
Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discus the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act and our Amicus brief in Hotze v. U.S. Department of Treasury.
Hotze v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 12
Law Matters — Episode 11
Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our U.S. Supreme Court Amicus brief in Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. (MSI) v. Moore, a Second Amendment case.
Maryland Shall Issue v. Moore — Amicus Brief
For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 11
Rhode v. Bonta — Amicus Brief in Second Appeal
Today, our firm filed our third amicus brief in the case challenging California’s background check requirement for ammunition purchases — our first amicus brief was filed in the prior appeal well before the Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen and the second